Does California Have More Registered Voters Than Population

Aspect of election history

The historical trends in voter turnout in the The states presidential elections take been determined by the gradual expansion of voting rights from the initial restriction to white male belongings owners aged 21 or older in the early years of the country's independence to all citizens aged 18 or older in the mid-20th century. Voter turnout in United States presidential elections has historically been higher than the turnout for midterm elections.^[1]

Approximately 240 1000000 people were eligible to vote in the 2020 presidential election and roughly 66.ane% of them submitted ballots, totaling near 158 million. Biden received most 81 meg votes, Trump about 74 million votes, and other candidates (including Jo Jorgensen and Howie Hawkins) a combined approximately three one thousand thousand votes.

History of voter turnout [edit]

U.S. presidential ballot popular vote totals as a percentage of the total U.Due south. population. The blackness line is the total turnout, while colored lines reflect votes for major parties. This chart represents the number of votes bandage equally a percentage of the full population, and does non compare either of those quantities with the percentage of the population that was eligible to vote.^[3]

Early 19th century: Universal white male suffrage [edit]

The gradual expansion of the right to vote from only belongings-owning men to include all white men over 21 was an important movement in the period from 1800 to 1830.^[4] Older states with property restrictions dropped them, namely all merely Rhode Isle, Virginia and Due north Carolina by the mid-1820s. No new states had property qualifications, although iii had adopted tax-paying qualifications – Ohio, Louisiana and Mississippi, of which only in Louisiana were these meaning and long-lasting.^[5] The process was peaceful and widely supported, except in Rhode Island. In Rhode Isle, the Dorr Rebellion of the 1840s demonstrated that the need for equal suffrage was broad and strong, although the subsequent reform included a significant belongings requirement for any resident born outside of the United States. However, free black men lost voting rights in several states during this menses.^[6]

The fact that a man was now legally immune to vote did non necessarily mean he routinely voted. He had to be pulled to the polls, which became the well-nigh important role of the local parties. These parties systematically sought out potential voters and brought them to the polls. Voter turnout soared during the 1830s, reaching nigh lxxx% of the adult male population in the 1840 presidential election.^[7] Revenue enhancement-paying qualifications remained in only five states by 1860 – Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Delaware and North Carolina.^[8]

Another innovative strategy for increasing voter participation and input followed. Prior to the presidential ballot of 1832, the Anti-Masonic Party conducted the nation's first presidential nominating convention. Held in Baltimore, Maryland, September 26–28, 1831, it transformed the process by which political parties select their presidential and vice-presidential candidates.^[9]

1870s: African American male suffrage [edit]

The passage of the Fifteenth Amendment to the United states of america Constitution in 1870 gave African American men the right to vote. While this historic expansion of rights resulted in significant increases in the eligible voting population and may have contributed to the increases in the proportion of votes bandage for president as a per centum of the total population during the 1870s, there does not seem to have been a pregnant long-term increase in the percentage of eligible voters who turn out for the poll. The disenfranchisement of nigh African Americans and many poor whites in the South during the years 1890–1910 likely contributed to the decline in overall voter turnout percentages during those years visible in the chart beneath.

Early 1920s: Women's suffrage [edit]

There was no systematic collection of voter turnout data by gender at a national level before 1964, but smaller local studies indicate a low turnout among female voters in the years post-obit Women's suffrage in the United States. For example, a 1924 study of voter turnout in Chicago institute that "female Chicagoans were far less likely to have visited the polls on Election 24-hour interval than were men in both the 1920 presidential election (46% vs. 75%) and the 1923 mayoral competition (35% vs. 63%)."^[ten] The study compared reasons given by male person and female non-voters and constitute that female non-voters were more than likely to cite general indifference to politics and ignorance or timidity regarding elections than male person non-voters, and that female person voter were less likely to cite fearfulness of loss of business organisation or wages. Nearly significantly, however, 11% of female person non-voters in the survey cited a "Disbelief in woman'southward voting" as the reason they did not vote.

The graph of voter turnout percentages shows a dramatic decline in turnout over the kickoff two decades of the twentieth century, ending in 1920 when the Nineteenth Amendment to the Usa Constitution granted women the right to vote across the U.s.a.. But in the preceding decades, several states had passed laws supporting women's suffrage. Women were granted the right to vote in Wyoming in 1869, before the territory had become a total state in the union. In 1889, when the Wyoming constitution was drafted in training for statehood, it included women'southward suffrage. Thus Wyoming was also the showtime total country to grant women the correct to vote. In 1893, Colorado was the first state to amend an existing constitution in order to grant women the correct to vote, and several other states followed, including Utah and Idaho in 1896, Washington Land in 1910, California in 1911, Oregon, Kansas, and Arizona in 1912, Alaska and Illinois in 1913, Montana and Nevada in 1914, New York in 1917; Michigan, South Dakota, and Oklahoma in 1918. Each of these suffrage laws expanded the body of eligible voters, and considering women were less likely to vote than men, each of these expansions created a turn down in voter turnout rates, culminating with the extremely low turnouts in the 1920 and 1924 elections after the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment.

This voting gender gap waned throughout the middle decades of the twentieth century.

Age, didactics, and income [edit]

Voter turnout by sex and age for the 2008 U.S. Presidential Ballot.

Age, income, and educational attainment are significant factors affecting voter turnout. Educational attainment is perhaps the best predictor of voter turnout, and in the 2008 election, those holding advanced degrees were 3 times more probable to vote than those with less than high schoolhouse instruction. Income correlated well with the likelihood of voting too. The income correlation may exist because of a correlation between income and educational attainment, rather than a direct issue of income.^{[ commendation needed ]}

Age [edit]

The age difference is associated with youth voter turnout. Some argue that "age is an important factor in understanding voting blocs and differences" on diverse issues.^[11] Others argue that young people are typically "plagued" past political apathy and thus do not have stiff political opinions.^[12] Equally strong political opinions may be considered i of the reasons behind voting,^[thirteen] political apathy amidst young people is arguably a predictor for depression voter turnout. One study found that potential young voters are more willing to commit to voting when they see pictures of younger candidates running for elections/role or voting for other candidates, surmising that young Americans are "voting at college and like rates to other Americans when at that place is a candidate under the age of 35 years running".^[xiv] As such, since most candidates running for office are pervasively over the age of 35 years,^[15] youth may not be actively voting in these elections because of a lack of representation or visibility in the political procedure.

Recent decades accept seen increasing concern over the fact that youth voter turnout is consistently lower than turnout among older generations. Several programs to increase the rates of voting among young people – such equally MTV'due south "Rock the Vote" (founded in 1990) and the "Vote or Dice" initiative (starting in 2004) – may have marginally increased turnouts of those between the ages of 18 and 25 to vote. However, the Stanford Social Innovation Review found no evidence of a turn down in youth voter turnout. In fact, they argue that "Millennials are turning out at similar rates to the previous two generations when they face their first elections."^[xvi]

Education [edit]

Rates in voting in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election by educational attainment

Education is another factor considered to have a major touch on voter turnout rates. A report past Burman investigated the relationship between formal education levels and voter turnout.^[17] This report demonstrated the effect of rising enrollment in college education circa 1980s, which resulted in an increase in voter turnout. However, "this was non true for political knowledge";^[17] a ascension in education levels did non have any impact in identifying those with political knowledge (a signifier of civic engagement) until the 1980s ballot, when college education became a distinguishing factor in identifying civic participation. This article poses a multifaceted perspective on the effect of education levels on voter turnout. Based on this article, one may surmise that education has go a more powerful predictor of civic participation, discriminating more between voters and non-voters. However, this was non true for political cognition; didactics levels were non a signifier of political knowledge. Gallego (2010) also contends that voter turnout tends to be higher in localities where voting mechanisms accept been established and are easy to operate – i.east. voter turnout and participation tends to be loftier in instances where registration has been initiated by the country and the number of electoral parties is small. I may contend that ease of access – and not education level – may be an indicator of voting beliefs. Presumably larger, more urban cities will have greater budgets/resources/infrastructure defended to elections, which is why youth may have higher turnout rates in those cities versus more rural areas. Though youth in larger (read: urban) cities tend to exist more educated than those in rural areas (Marcus & Krupnick, 2017), mayhap there is an external variable (i.e. ballot infrastructure) at play. Smith and Tolbert'southward (2005) research reiterates that the presence of ballot initiatives and portals within a land have a positive upshot on voter turnout. Some other correlated finding in his study (Snyder, 2011) was that education is less important as a predictor of voter turnout in states than tend to spend more on education. Moreover, Snyder'south (2011) research suggests that students are more probable to vote than non-students. It may be surmised that an increase of country investment in balloter infrastructure facilitates and teaching policy and programs results in increase voter turnout amid youth.

Income [edit]

Rates of voting in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election past income

Wealthier people tend to vote at higher rates. Harder and Krosnick (2008) fence that some of the reasons for this may be due to "differences in motivation or ability (sometimes both)" (Harder and Krosnick, 2008), or that less wealthy people have less energy, time, or resource to allot towards voting. Another potential reason may be that wealthier people believe that they have more at stake if they don't vote than those with less resource or income. Maslow'due south hierarchy of needs might also help explain this hypothesis from a psychological perspective. If those with low income are struggling to meet the basic survival needs of nutrient, water, safety, etc., they volition not be motivated enough to reach the final stages of "Esteem" or "Self-actualization" needs (Maslow, 1943) – which consist of the desire for nobility, respect, prestige and realizing personal potential, respectively.

Gender gap [edit]

Since 1980, the voting gender gap has completely reversed, with a higher proportion of women voting than men in each of the last nine presidential elections. The Heart for American Women and Politics summarizes how this trend can be measured differently both in terms of proportion of voters to non-voters, and in terms of the bulk number of votes bandage. "In every presidential election since 1980, the proportion of eligible female adults who voted has exceeded the proportion of eligible male adults who voted [...]. In all presidential elections prior to 1980, the voter turnout rate for women was lower than the rate for men. The number of female voters has exceeded the number of male voters in every presidential election since 1964..."^[18] This gender gap has been a determining factor in several recent presidential elections, as women have been consistently nearly 15% more than probable to support the candidate of the Democratic Party than the Republican candidate in each election since 1996.^[19]

Race and ethnicity [edit]

Voter turnout in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election by race/ethnicity.

Race and ethnicity has had an effect on voter turnout in recent years, with data from recent elections such every bit 2008 showing much lower turnout amid people identifying as Hispanic or Asian ethnicity than other voters (run across chart to the right). One factor impacting voter turnout of African Americans is that, as of the 2000 election, thirteen% of African American males are reportedly ineligible to vote nationwide because of a prior felony conviction; in sure states – Florida, Alabama, and Mississippi – disenfranchisement rates for African American males in the 2000 ballot were around xxx%.^[20]

Other eligibility factors [edit]

Another factor influencing statistics on voter turnout is the pct of the country'southward voting-age population^{[ clarification needed ]} who are ineligible to vote due to not-denizen status or prior felony convictions. In a 2001 article in the American Political Scientific discipline Review, Michael P. McDonald and Samuel Popkin argued, that at least in the United States, voter turnout since 1972 has not really declined when calculated for those eligible to vote, what they term the voting-eligible population.^[21] ^{[ clarification needed ]} In 1972, noncitizens and ineligible felons (depending on land police) constituted near two% of the voting-age population. By 2004, ineligible voters constituted nearly 10%.^[22] Ineligible voters are non evenly distributed across the country, roughly 15% of California's voting-historic period population is ineligible to vote – which confounds comparisons of states.^[23]

Turnout statistics [edit]

The following table shows the available information on turnout for the voting-age population (VAP) and voting-eligible population (VEP) since 1936.^[24]

Ballot	Voting-age Population (VAP)^[25]	Voting-eligible Population (VEP)^[25]	Turnout^[25]	% Turnout of VAP^[25] ^{[ clarification needed ]}	% Turnout of VEP^[25]
1932	75,768,000		39,817,000	52.6%
1936	80,174,000		45,647,000	56.9%
1940	84,728,000		49,815,000	58.8%
1944	85,654,000		48,026,000	56.1%
1948	95,573,000		48,834,000	51.one%
1952	99,929,000		61,552,000	61.6%
1956	104,515,000		62,027,000	59.3%
1960	109,672,000		68,836,000	62.8%
1964	114,090,000		lxx,098,000	61.4%
1968	120,285,000		73,027,000	60.vii%
1972	140,777,000		77,625,000	55.1%
1976	152,308,000		81,603,000	53.6%
1980	163,945,000	159,635,102	86,497,000	52.8%	54.2%
1984	173,995,000	167,701,904	92,655,000	53.3%	55.two%
1988	181,956,000	173,579,281	91,587,000	50.three%	52.eight%
1992	189,493,000	179,655,523	104,600,000	55.two%	58.two%
1996	196,789,000	186,347,044	96,390,000	49.0%	51.vii%
2000	209,787,000	194,331,436	105,594,000	50.3%	54.3%
2004	219,553,000	203,483,455	122,349,000	55.7%	sixty.ane%
2008	229,945,000	213,313,508	131,407,000	57.1%	62.five%
2012	235,248,000	222,474,111	129,235,000	53.8%	58.0%
2016	249,422,000	230,931,921	136,669,276	54.8%	59.2%
2020^[23]	257,605,088	239,247,182	159,690,457	62.0%	66.9%

Note: The Bipartisan Policy Centre has stated that turnout for 2012 was 57.5 percent of the voting-age population (VAP),^{[ clarification needed ]} which they claim was a decline from 2008. They estimate that as a pct of eligible voters, turnout was: 2000, 54.two%; in 2004 60.4%; 2008 62.3%; and 2012 57.5%.^[26]

The BPC 2012 vote count is low because their document was written just after the 2012 election, earlier final counts were in. Their voting-eligible population (VEP)^{[ description needed ]} does not include adjustments for felons (run into p.13). The United States Elections Project, by Michael McDonald calculates VEP including citizenship and adjustments for felons. The site'southward information on turnout as percentage of eligible voters (VEP), is slightly higher and similar to BPC: 2000 55.iii%, 2004 60.7%, 2008 62.2%, 2012 58.vi%. McDonald's voter turnout data for 2016 is sixty.one% and 50% for 2018.^[27]

After analysis by the University of California, Santa Barbara'due south American Presidency Projection found that at that place were 235,248,000 people of voting age in the U.s.a. in the 2012 ballot, resulting in 2012 voting age population (VAP) turnout of 54.nine%.^[28] The total increment in VAP between 2008 and 2012 (v,300,000) was the smallest increase since 1964, bucking the mod average of eight,000,000–xiii,000,000 per bicycle.

References [edit]

^ New York Times Editorial Board (November xi, 2014). "Stance | The Worst Voter Turnout in 72 Years". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved Jan 29, 2018.
^ "Voter Turnout Past State 2021". worldpopulationreview.com . Retrieved July 27, 2021.
^ Come across "National Turnout Rates, 1787-2018" (United States Ballot Project)
^ Keyssar, The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the The states (2009) ch two
^ Engerman, pp. 8–9
^ Murrin, John Grand.; Johnson, Paul E.; McPherson, James M.; Fahs, Alice; Gerstle, Gary (2012). Liberty, Equality, Power: A History of the American People (6th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. p. 296. ISBN978-0-495-90499-1.
^ William G. Shade, "The Second Party Organization". in Paul Kleppner, et al. Development of American Electoral Systems (1983) pp. 77–111
^ Engerman, p. 35. Table 1
^ William Preston Vaughn, The Anti-Masonic Political party in the U.s.a.: 1826–1843 (2009)
^ Allen, Jodie T. (March 18, 2009). "Reluctant Suffragettes: When Women Questioned Their Correct to Vote". Pew Research Center . Retrieved January 29, 2018.
^ Berman; Johnson (2000). "Historic period, ambition, and the local lease: a study in voting behavior".
^ Catapano, Tyler (2014). "?".
^ Munsey (2008). "Why Nosotros Wrote: Why do we vote?". APA Monitor. 39 (six): 60.
^ Pomante; Schraufnagel (2014). "Candidate Age and Youth Voter Turnout". American Politics Inquiry. 43 (iii): 479–503. doi:10.1177/1532673x14554829. S2CID 156019567.
^ Struyk (2017). "The Autonomous Political party has an age problem". CNN.
^ Kiesa, Abby; Levine, Peter (March 21, 2016). "Practice Nosotros Actually Desire College Youth Voter Turnout?". Stanford Social Innovation Review . Retrieved Jan 29, 2018.
^ ^a ^b Burden, B. (2009). "The dynamic effects of instruction on voter turnout". Electoral Studies. 28 (4): 540–549. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2009.05.027.
^ "Gender Differences in Voter Turnout" (PDF). Rutgers Academy Center for American Women and Politics. July twenty, 2017. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
^ Waldman, Paul (March 17, 2016). "Stance | Why the 2016 election may produce the largest gender gap in history". Washington Post . Retrieved January 29, 2018.
^ Written report: Non-Voting Felons Increasing, ABC News, January half-dozen, 2006.
^ McDonald, Michael P.; Popkin, Samuel Fifty. (December 2001). "The Myth of the Vanishing Voter". The American Political Scientific discipline Review. 95 (4): 963–974. doi:x.1017/S0003055400400134. JSTOR 3117725. S2CID 141727274.
^ "2004G - The states Elections Project". www.electproject.org . Retrieved October 31, 2020.
^ ^a ^b "2020g - United States Elections Project". www.electproject.org . Retrieved October 31, 2020.
^ "Denominator - The states Elections Project".
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e "Voter Turnout in Presidential Elections | The American PresidencyProject". www.presidency.ucsb.edu . Retrieved January 8, 2021.
^ "2012 Election Turnout Dips Below 2008 and 2004 Levels: Number Of Eligible Voters Increases By 8 Meg, 5 Million Fewer Votes Cast" (PDF). Bipartisan Policy Center. Nov 8, 2012. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
^ "Voter Turnout Data - United States Elections Project". world wide web.electproject.org . Retrieved October 31, 2020.
^ "Voter Turnout in Presidential Elections". UC Santa Barbara American Presidency Projection . Retrieved January 29, 2018.

External links [edit]

"National Turnout Rates, 1787-2018" (Usa Election Project)